The Predicate View of Proper Names
نویسنده
چکیده
The Millian view that the meaning of a proper name is simply its referent has long been popular among philosophers of language. It might even be deemed the orthodox view, despite its well-known difficulties. Fregean and Russellian alternatives, though widely discussed, are much less popular. The Predicate View has not even been taken seriously, at least until fairly recently, but finally, it is receiving the attention it deserves. It says that a name expresses the property of bearing that name. Despite its apparent shortcomings, it has a distinct virtue: It straightforwardly reckons with the fact that proper names generally have multiple bearers and are sometimes used to ascribe the property of bearing a name rather than to refer to a particular bearer of the name. It holds that proper names are much the same as common nouns, both semantically and syntactically, with only superficial differences. They both can be quantified and modified. The main difference, at least in English (and some other languages), is that when used to refer a proper name, unlike a common noun, is not preceded by the definite article. The Predicate View accounts for manifestly predicative uses, but to be vindicated, it needs to do justice to the fact that the main use of proper names is to refer.
منابع مشابه
Proto-Rigidity
It is often claimed that Kripke (1980) and Putnam (1975) established that many predicates, most importantly natural kind predicates, are like proper names in being rigid designators. This insight is generally regarded as having important consequences in the theory of necessary truths: the rigidity of terms such as 'Hesperus', 'Phosphorus', 'water' and 'H 2 O' is used in explaining why identity ...
متن کاملOn the Status of Proper Names in the Grammar
This paper is yet another contribution to the enormous theoretical headache that is the syntactic and semantic analysis of proper names. In particular, I provide a preliminary argument for the claim that proper names are always syntactically base-generated as functional items, as types of pronouns. I will do so by constructing a reductio ad absurdum argument against the opposing view, the view ...
متن کاملThe Semantics of Proper Names and Other Bare Nominals
Title of dissertation: THE SEMANTICS OF PROPER NAMES AND OTHER BARE NOMINALS Yu Izumi, Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 Dissertation directed by: Professor Paul M Pietroski Department of Philosophy This research proposes a unified approach to the semantics of the so-called bare nominals, which include proper names (e.g., Mary), mass and plural terms (e.g., water, cats), and articleless noun phrases i...
متن کاملThe Mental Representation of Brand Names: Are Brand Names a Class by Themselves?
What are brand names? This question has fascinated marketers and researchers for decades and has been addressed from various perspectives. There is the marketing view that brand names are part of the actual product and services (e.g., Javed, 1993); there is the branding view that brand names are linguistic symbols associated with a set of new meanings (Aaker, 1991; Keller, 1998); there is the s...
متن کامل